Quantum Physics

    

Quantum Mechanics and The Subjective Nature of Mathematics

Authors: Joseph Palazzo

In the historical debate between Einstein and Bohr, it is practically seen in every sentence that Einstein was debating ontology ("Do you really believe the moon is not there when you are not looking at it?")[1] while Bohr was debating epistemology (we only know until particles are observed, at which point the "wave function collapses" into a definite state). This is like as if one is talking about basketball, while the other is talking about hockey. It’s no surprise that they were talking passed each other, not aware of what was going on. Worse is that the whole physics community for the past 100 years did not see it. In 2022, the Nobel Prize in physics was headlined as: quantum mechanics is right, Einstein is wrong — indicating by all measures that we still don’t have it right.

Comments: 3 Pages. (Note by viXra Admin: An abstract in the article labeled as such in the article is required)

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2026-06-08 19:36:21

Unique-IP document downloads: 0 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus